The CIA, Hedgefunds, and Online Marketers All Have This Problem. Here’s The Solution.

Share & Comment

triangles

Read the words in the triangles above: I’ll explain why in a couple moments.

A few days ago I got a text message from a friend who owns a hedge fund and happened to be in town for the day asking if I am able to get together with him. This friend designs complex investment models for institutional investors including Blackstone. Much of what he does overlaps with web analytics and digital marketing, in the sense that he is analyzing millions of variables, and interpreting that data to make better informed decisions in an uncertain environment and more importantly, an ever changing environment(i.e. every searcher and website visitor is a different person.)

What many people don’t realize is that the CIA operates in the same environment. They are gathering and analyzing data, interpreting it, and making decisions in an uncertain environment.

Ok, remember that picture I shared above with the sentences in the triangles? I’m willing to bet that you actually misread those sentences, just like I did, when I read them originally. (Unless you have seen this before or are incredibly perceptive.)

Now look back at the words in the triangles and see if you can figure out your mistake. If you can’t, I will shed some light in another few moments.

Whether you see the mistake yet or not, the lesson is important, no matter how smart you are, there is a good chance your mindset and its natural filters of the senses can cause you to make a mistake when the truth is staring you in the face clear as day.

In fact, we are bombarded with so many stimuli to your sense all day that we naturally filter out most of it. When it comes to data analysis, especially when the stakes are high, including life or death for CIA analysts, it is extremely important to recognize the existence of these filters and understand them.

Luckily for us marketers and hedge fund managers, the stakes are significantly higher for the CIA and they have invested very heavily into understanding how to analyze and interpret data in an uncertain environment. In fact, many years ago, the CIA commissioned a deep report which is now a book specifically about the analysis of information. It’s called.

The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis  by Richard Heuer

According to my friend from the hedge fund, this book is the best investment book every written, and as I read it, I am leaning towards calling it the best internet marketing and especially media buying and paid search advertising book every written.

The first picture in this post, with the words in the triangles, is taken out straight out of this book. (If you are wondering what your mistake was, all three triangles have a word written twice but most people read it as one instance of the word because our minds expect only one word and are somewhat familiar with these popular phrases. )

As you can see, we can be completely blind to plain as Jane facts sitting right in front of us.

Many moons ago I wrote a blogpost about the marketing mantra: Test, Test, Test. In that post I wondered if someone who doesn’t analyze everything about their marketing might get similar results to someone who does. While my hypothesis was rejected by most, it seems that Chapter 5 of this CIA handbook actually brings proof to a similar concept.

First though, let’s look at a couple more pictures and examples of how our minds can interpret the same data in two different ways.

Look at this picture starting from the first image and what do you see? Now, look at it starting from the last image and what do you see?

If you start from the beginning , you probably see a man’s face in all the images. If you start from the bottom, you probably see a woman in most the pictures.

What this demonstrates is that what you actually see and perceive is directly influenced by what you are EXPECTING to see based on preconception.

The first step in being a great data analyst is to recognize this truth. You can talk about rooting out prejudice and being objective, but those are fantasies that don’t really apply to the real world. What you need is a second opinion, a fresh set of eyes, or one of many different ideas that I haven’t gotten to yet in the Psychology of intelligence analysis book yet.

Here is another, more classic image that I first saw in  Steven Covey’s 7 habits of highly effective people book, but it’s also in this CIA guide on intelligence analysis.

 

Looking at this picture you can either see a young lady or an old woman. Which one do you see? Now look carefully and see if you can see both. If you start from the top, you likely see a young lady, if you start from the bottom you likely see and old woman.

This exercise is usually prefaced by two groups of people, one shown a regular pic of a young lady and the other a regular pic of an old woman, and than letting them fight with each other over what this picture actually depicts.

The Bottom Line is that You See what Your Mind EXPECTS To See. (Not what you want to see, what you expect to see and it takes conscious effort to change that perception.)

It takes a split second to make a snap judgement, but it takes a herculean effort to change an existing perception.

Hopefully by now you are sold on the idea that you have filters that you are probably not conscious of and therefore can’t really protect against. (most people believe they are very self aware, but very few are aware of all the things that color their perception.) In fact, the solution here is less about knowing what your preconceived perceptions are but rather are about accepting the existence of these filters, allowing you to keep an open mind to second opinions, especially from fresh eyes with no preconceived perceptions about this data.

This leads a much more important point and deep insight into data analysis.

If your perception of something is colored by preconceived notions, than when you get your data incrementally instead of all at one time, the first (incomplete) data you saw, and the snap judgement or even assumption you made about it, will color how and what you perceive from the rest of the data as it comes in.

We already know that we filter out stimuli, the same way we filtered out the double words in the image with the words in triangles, so once you have an idea about something, even if you know its incomplete, you will still be impacted by the filters that see what they expect to see as more information comes in.

This was a particularly difficult challenge for CIA analysts who get the information in piecemeal as it comes in. Luckily, policy makers who only get the report at the end of the data collection have less preconceived notions and anecdotal evidence from this dataset.

The CIA Manual cites a study of horse racing handicappers who were asked to analyze varying amounts of data about a specific race, they were asked to provide the 5 most important factors with their weights, the 2o most, and the 40 most. They than compared their accuracy based on having only those 5 pieces of data or 20 or all 40, and invariably their accuracy was virtually the same.

More Surprising is that their Confidence with the extra data grew exponentially, while their accuracy stayed the same.

In other words they were over-confident with the extra information, but it didn’t improve their accuracy.

What this means is that the first few metrics that they saw led to them buying into some sort of narrative, and the rest of the data was filtered to support that initial assumption.

The critical Question about paid search marketing or any advertising or data analysis is, “Do You Have Too Much Information?”

We all like to believe that knowledge is power and that the more information the better. We are obsessed with big data and fancy modeling, etc…

But, if the net effect of having that extra information is that it only improves our confidence about our interpretations but doesn’t actually impact our interpretation, too much information can lead to mistakes, close mindedness, and potentially poorer results.

Don’t get me wrong, we need the facts…But do we need More Data?

Perhaps the advertising world has got it all wrong. Maybe it’s not about more data or better data but rather better analysts who are more open minded, who seek out second and third opinions, and who recognize the inherent flaws in human perception and analysis and take those into account when making critical business decisions.

I am blown away by the amount of third party data available to advertisers today. Yet, when I asked a friend who is a major media buyer about the effectiveness of using these awesome data sets he replied that as best as he can tell it is never worth the extra cost in the media buying. (first party data is a different story.)

The thing about the above discussion that I found new insight into is not the idea that the data is just too expensive but rather that our flaw is focusing on more data instead of better analysis.

Maybe the programmatic advertising world has got it all wrong. Maybe they are thinking about things backwards. Instead of better targeting abilities and More Data, we need fresher ways to think about digital marketing in 2015.

 

 

 

Share & Comment
Get Access To My Private Content Collection
Get Access To Hundreds of Never Before Published Articles

The Most Valuable Traffic Strategy Revealed!

Get my step by step guide to feeding off other people's popularity to grow your traffic.

About David Melamed

David Melamed is the Founder of Tenfold Traffic, a search and content marketing agency with over $15,000,000 of paid search experience and battle tested results in content development, premium content promotion and distribution, Link Profile Analysis, Multinational/Multilingual PPC and SEO, and Direct Response Copywriting.

Comments

  1. Definitely one of the most interesting posts out of all the blogs i subscribe to

    Thank You

  2. Having done those kinds of brain test things before, I was familiar with the ideas of only seeing what I want I to see and pre-existing expectations clouding my judgement, but how it ended up being something that could make or break marketing was something that I had never thought about. It does make it your final point really valid, that fresher minds could be much more valuable than anything else.

  3. As soon as you said to go back and read the words in the triangles again I knew that I’d messed up, even though I had seen something like that before, so I knew that it would be one of those double word things. I actually noticed both aspects of the man and woman in the second one but could not for the life of me see the old woman in the third picture. Mind tricks aside though, I found this post to be really insightful and there are some really good points there. I mean, I know everyone can be clouded by judgment and perceptions they might not even be aware of, but it can really affect us not just in our personal lives but with business as well.

  4. Such an insightful post, David. If this book that you’ve recommended is anything like what you’ve written here, then I know it will be very worth the read. Interesting to think that tools used by the CIA – well, their mindset – could actually be interchangeable between their tasks and internet marketing. Great diagrams too. They always trick me up no matter what, but I guess that’s just helped to make your point, hasn’t it?

  5. This post was quite good and I loved some of the points that you make. Also checked out your book recommendation for ‘The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis’ and I’ve spent the last fifteen minutes or so reading through some if the reviews in amazon and you’re not the only one raving about it. Definitely going to check it out!

  6. This is beyond interesting! I loved how you explained the whole thing because it all really does make sense and something did click in my mind. I definitely think that after reading this, there is a lot of things that the advertising world gets wrong in general that could be changed if more people thought about it this way. Awesome post!

Speak Your Mind

*